Declare your disbelief

Sure, that’s the ticket!

val — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:08:44 +0000

So Brit Hume thinks Tiger Woods should convert to Christianity, as Tiger’s Buddhism isn’t up to the task of dealing with his marital problems. Because that worked so well for such stalwart Christians as Sen. John Ensign and Gov. Mark Sanford, right?

Starting the New Year right: Atheist Ireland flouts new blasphemy law with a little help from Jesus and Frank Zappa

kateco — Sun, 03 Jan 2010 08:11:44 +0000

Ireland’s new blasphemy law went into effect on January 1, 2010. According to Atheist Ireland, “Blasphemy is now a crime punishable by a €25,000 fine. The new law defines blasphemy as publishing or uttering matter that is grossly abusive or insulting in relation to matters held sacred by any religion, thereby intentionally causing outrage among a substantial number of adherents of that religion, with some defences permitted.”

As part of the organization’s campaign to have the law repealed, it has published a list of 25 quotes that would be considered blasphemous under the new law — including some by Jesus Christ, Muhammed and Frank Zappa. Read the quotes and learn more — including why it is always bad to “silence people to protect ideas” – visit blashpemy.ie.

P.S. I can hardly believe we’re back! Thanks Val.

16% of US high school science teachers are creationists

val — Wed, 21 May 2008 05:33:40 +0000

New Scientist reports from a survey from Pennsylvania State University that around 12% say they teach creationism or intelligent design as a “valid, scientific alternative to Darwinian explanations for the origin of species”.

Knowledge of atheism considered harmful

val — Wed, 09 Apr 2008 15:11:07 +0000

Well, we’re a bit late to the party, but this was just too good to pass up: Illinois Democratic state representative Monique Davis telling an atheist activist testifying before the Assembly that

“it’s dangerous for our children to even know that your philosophy exists!”

and yelled at him to get out of his seat and leave, that he had no right to be there.

Wow, so wrong so many different ways. Plenty has already been said — and it pretty well speaks for itself — so I’ll leave it at that. Read and hear the entire exchange; she gets pretty worked up. Eric Zorn at the Chicago Tribune has a good roundup.

kateco — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 07:31:27 +0000

Ed Humes’ Monkey Girl: Evolution, Education, Religion and the Battle for America’s Soul is now out in paperback and californiaauthors.com is holding a drawing to celebrate. Two lucky winners will get an autographed copy of Humes’ critically acclaimed book on the Dover, PA creationism case. Visit CaliforniaAuthors.com for details. Drawing ends on Friday, February 22.

The Washington Post review called it “gripping.” From the WP:

In 2004, when the Dover, Penn., school board voted to require biology classes to use a supplemental textbook that promoted the theory of intelligent design rather than evolution, the conflict that erupted was about far more than semantics. As Edward Humes describes in this lively and thoughtful book, Dover — like Dayton, Tenn., during the 1925 Scopes “Monkey Trial” — became a proving ground for clashing beliefs about the origins of life and constitutional questions about the separation of church and state.

Learn more about Monkey Girl at edwardhumes.com or at the DYD bookstore.

John McCain develops evangelical poll repellent

kateco — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:22:50 +0000

Big bull evangelical James Dobson tells the rabid-right-o-sphere that he’d rather not vote than to vote for John McCain. In a statement released to the Laura Ingraham show, Dobson says:

But what a sad and melancholy decision this is for me and many other conservatives. Should John McCain capture the nomination as many assume, I believe this general election will offer the worst choices for president in my lifetime. I certainly can’t vote for Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama based on their virulently anti-family policy positions. If these are the nominees in November, I simply will not cast a ballot for president for the first time in my life.

Dobson cites McCain’s devilish record on stem cell research, his position on a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage and his foul mouthed ways as reasons for his decision. Read more and hear Ingraham read the statement at Talking Points Memo.

God’s new man in the Blue House

kateco — Sun, 03 Feb 2008 04:05:21 +0000

When South Korea’s president-elect was mayor of Seoul, he said the city was a holy place governed by God. He’s been associated with Korean evangelicals who pray at their monster rallies for the destruction of all Buddhist temples in Korea. The mega-church he attends is chock full of other government officials. Read more at the Asia Times.

What the hell happened?

kateco — Mon, 28 Jan 2008 22:15:24 +0000

God in the White House — a new book from religious historian, episcopal priest and editor-at-large of Chrisitanity Today, Randall Balmer — explores the history and the consequences of the “religionization” of the presidency from John F Kennedy through George W. Bush. From an excerpt offered at npr.org:

… [E]xamples suggest that the quest for moral rectitude in presidential candidates may be chimerical. The candidates’ declarations of faith over the past several decades provide a fairly poor indicator of how they govern. Even the record of the two redeemer presidents of the past half century, Jimmy Carter and George W. Bush, is mixed. Carter actually sought to govern according to his moral lights and in fidelity to the principles of decency, honor, and fair play that he articulated on the campaign trail; the American voters resoundingly repudiated him when he ran for a second term.

Bush sought the presidency on a platform of morality and Christian virtues. Yet his policies in the first decade of the twenty-first century reflected those values only dimly, if at all. Perhaps it’s time to shift our attention away from the candidates and toward the electorate. What is it we expect from our presidents? Do we look for charisma and political skills, experience in foreign and domestic policy, and administrative competence? Or do we demand that candidates for the White House pass some sort of catechetical test? It’s not an either-or proposition, of course, but the record of the last four decades of the twentieth century suggests that we’ve moved toward the latter and away from the former.

But at what cost?…

Read the complete excerpt, “Cheap Grace: Piety and the Presidency” at npr.org.

Randall Balmer is also the author of the Encyclopedia of Evangelicalism and Mine Eyes Have Seen the Glory: A Journey into the Evangelical Subculture in America.

Holiday decorating?

kateco — Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:28:29 +0000

Hey, Atheists like piney holiday goodness too. Celebrate the season by adorning your solstice evergreen with nifnak.com’s Flying Spaghetti Monster Ornament.

Or get your craft on for the New Year and whip up some of Kate’s make-your-own solstice decorations. Click here to get step-by-step instructions for making solstice lanterns from strings of holiday lights and pretty tree ornaments from citrus fruit.

Isn’t that Torquemada calling the kettle black?

kateco — Tue, 04 Dec 2007 22:11:19 +0000

AP: Pope Benedict XVI strongly criticized atheism in a major document released Friday, saying it had led to some of the “greatest forms of cruelty and violations of justice” ever known. Read more from the Associated Press. Read the encyclical “Saved by Hope” at the Vatican web site.

It is hard to believe that Benedict, touted as a great Roman Catholic intellectual, would put forth the worn argument that Stalin and Mao are proof that disbelief itself is a source of monumental evil in the world, but that is exactly the tired old horse he trots out. So much has been written about this, that I couldn’t have much to add, except to say that it seems obvious that cult of personality leaders of the 20th century were not so much anti-religionists as men who simply wanted to replace one god with another in the Big Power Equation — to replace the unquestioned divine right of kings with the unquestioned divine right of, well, themselves. Louis XVI would have understood Stalin perfectly. One was the Vatican-backed ruler of the Most Catholic France who starved, brutalized and executed his countrymen, the other a “godless” former seminarian who took over the oppression of Russia to starve, brutalize and execute his countrymen.

Also always appropriate to note while running over this rutted old road, adherents to this Stalin/Mao argument seem to be cafeteria critics, conveniently picking a few “godless” monsters to damn all disbelief by association, but as Christopher Hitchens points out, “No country has ever fallen into despotism because it has followed the teachings of Spinoza, Thomas Jefferson and Albert Einstein .” [thx religionandatheism] It is as convenient for Il Papa to forget these as it is for him to forget Torquemada. It is easy for him to limit his discussion to the roots of evil in the 19th and 20th centuries, when the church had routinely tortured and burned people alive for the crime of dissent just a few generations earlier. Easy for him to ignore the fact that all of these atrocities have fanatical unquestioning belief — not disbelief — in common.